Is the Bible Still Relevant Today? Some Criticisms and Theological Responses
The Holy Bible is the cornerstone of Christianity and has profoundly transformed the minds of great thinkers throughout the course of human history. Nevertheless, many people in our current generation have questioned its relevance in context of our 'post-modern' world. Now, the Christian faith would argue differently. In this inquiry, we will have a discussion as to why the Bible can still be seen as relevant for today's moral landscape. We are going to explore both some of the criticisms concerning the Bible, and then some theological responses that can demonstrate its enduring words.
Why Some would say that the Bible is 'Outdated':
Historical Context: Some critics of the Bible tend to argue that the Bible reflects an era that is way beyond our current moral and cultural threshold as a collective society. Some evidence that's normally presented is that its teachings are founded upon outdated social norms, and that their scientific understanding was more ... superstitious rather than factual. This also leads to the highlighting of certain passages that seemingly 'condone slavery' or contradict scientific discoveries.
Incompatibility with modern science: Another popular reason is that biblical critics believe that the Bible is in contradiction with modern 'scientific findings'. They look at verses such as Genesis 1:3 where it describes the creation of the world to have happened over six days. As you might already know, scientific study suggests otherwise. It suggests that the universe is billions of years old, and that the formation of life on Earth, along with its broad diversification of species, occurred over a vast stretch of time. They suggest that there is no tangible evidence that the universe was just 'spoken into being' by a divine and supreme God.
So Many Interpretations: The difficulty of interpreting scripture can indeed contribute to its perceived irrelevance in society. There are so many doctrinal differences and denominational splits that they have become overwhelming. For example, there are more than 45,000 denominations (which include sub-groups) that are socially recognised. Different denominations and individuals emphasise on different passages and ideas, leading to an amalgamation of contradictory doctrines. This inconsistency makes scripture seem unreliable and open to the manipulation by those who have their own self-serving motives.
Secondly, it doesn't help when religious leaders can never seem to agree on the meaning of scripture. This can often weaken the perception of its textual authority as a source of moral truth to those who aren't Christian. This causes many people in society to be less inclined to look to God's word for guidance if there is no clear consensus of understanding on its primary message.
Contradictions: The Bible's vast scope and authorship then raise questions about inconsistencies and potential errors amongst its critics. The Bible's vast thematic scope and authorship presents a significant challenge in terms of those who want to understand its overall message. The Bible was compiled over the course of more than a millennium (around 1,600 years) by numerous authors from diverse backgrounds. The Bible incorporates a wide range of genres, from historical accounts and legal codes, poetry, proverbs, and apocalyptic visions. This variety can, of course, lead to seeming contradictions if one were to read it out of context.
Similarly, discrepancies can arise when cross-checking facts across different books. For example, a supposed contradiction arises when comparing Genesis 32:30 and John 1:18. In Genesis, Jacob claims to have "seen God face to face" after wrestling with a mysterious figure. John, however, states that "no one has seen God at any time." This apparent clash can cause confusion. These inconsistencies raise questions about the accuracy and reliability of Biblical texts, particularly for those approaching it from a purely historical or literal standpoint. Detractors would therefore argue that a divinely inspired text should then be free from discrepancies such as this, which cast doubt on the Bible's absolute truth.
A simple Counter-Argument
Defending the Bible's Relevance:
While the criticisms mentioned raise valid points, it's important to consider how true believers of the Christian faith would address the issues mentioned above. First, the Bible itself acknowledges its historical context through various means, including references to specific customs, rulers, and geographic locations.
Secondly, dietary laws in the book of Leviticus, such as restrictions on certain meats, were informed by their underlying agricultural practices and scientific understanding of the ancient world. By understanding the historical context, we can see that these restrictions were not meant to be universally applied dietary principles throughout history, but rather practices relevant to the health and well-being of the Israelites at that time. However, some would even argue that if it were good for them during their time, it probably would be good for us too now; especially since we live in a generation with stores that are full of unhealthy snacks and processed foods.
The authors also wrote to specific audiences within their own cultures, and it would be unjust to try and understand biblical principles without context of its audience. We cannot just open a text that is compiled of 66 different books (or 84 if you are from the Tewahedo Church), with different authors and literary styles, and expect to know everything it is intending to say in the time it was written. It is vital to note that without proper theological and historical context, we are at risk to lose its true theological substance. It is for this reason that we take the time to understand the context behind what is written in scripture, as it helps us to interpret the enduring moral principles of God's word that transcends beyond time.
We can really see the importance of contextualisation when we expand on the reasoning behind slavery in the Old Testament. For instance, the condemnation of slavery in the Old Testament, while existing within the social context of the time, speaks to a universal truth about how God values the practice of expressing a human dignity that applies across cultures and history. Even though the specific practices of slavery differed from ours, the Bible's message that all people are created equal and deserving of respect remains eternally relevant in today's context.
The Old Testament lays out numerous laws protecting slaves, limiting their work hours, and ensuring their fair treatment. These regulations, while existing within a world where slavery was common, planted the seeds for the eventual abolition of slavery throughout history. For example, Exodus 21:16 even states: "Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, must be put to death." This verse demonstrates the seriousness with which kidnapping and enslavement were viewed.
Then, Leviticus 25:39-40 outlines restrictions on how long an Israelite could be enslaved to another Israelite, and even mandates their release in the seventh year or Jubilee year: "If any of your dependent Israelites become so poor that they sell themselves to you, you must not make them do the work of a slave; treat them rather as your hired worker or helper, and they will be with you until the year of Jubilee. Then they and their children will be released from you, and they will go back to their own clan and return to the land of their fathers." These regulations, while not outlawing slavery altogether during their time, established a guideline that promoted a more humane system and paved the way for a more just society for the people of Israel.
On the topic of interpretation, Christianity recognizes the complexity of scripture. This is why tradition and reason play a role alongside individual interpretation. Through these tools, Christians can discern the Bible's core message while acknowledging the presence of different perspectives within the text. The existence of various interpretations does not negate the Bible's moral relevance; it highlights the richness and depth of its message, offering guidance for a wide range of situations.
Finally, regarding inconsistencies, some apparent contradictions can be resolved through careful study of the text's original languages and genres. Other seeming contradictions may reflect different perspectives within the narrative itself. The Bible is not a dry, scientific text; it is a collection of divinely inspired works that use various literary devices to convey God's message. Understanding these complexities allows Christians to appreciate the Bible's richness and its enduring moral relevance.
In Summary...
Timeless Morality: While cultural practices evolve, the Bible's core ethical principles – love, justice, compassion – remain eternally relevant. Passages like Micah 6:8 ("do justice, love kindness, walk humbly with your God") offer timeless guidance.
Interpretative Nuance: The Bible benefits from informed interpretation. Understanding the historical context and literary devices employed by the writers' sheds light on the intended meaning. Many passages are metaphorical or symbolic, not meant to be strictly literally translated as such.
Unity in Diversity: Despite supposed seeming contradictions, the Bible's overarching message – God's love and plan for humanity – remains consistent throughout the scriptures. Different perspectives from various authors contribute to a richer foundation of faith.
Scripture as a Guide:
Meaning and Purpose: The Bible addresses humanity's fundamental questions about existence, purpose, and morality. It offers answers in stories like the creation narrative in Genesis and teachings like the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7).
Comfort and Hope: The Bible provides solace in times of hardship. Psalms, for example, offer a language of lament and praise that resonates across cultures and centuries.
Challenge and Change: The Bible calls for self-reflection and societal transformation. Passages like those found in the prophets Amos and Isaiah advocate for justice and challenge the status quo.
The Bible's enduring relevance lies in its ability to:
Transcend Time: The core message of love, redemption, and God's presence remains eternally applicable.
Speak to the Human Condition: The Bible addresses universal human experiences – love, loss, suffering, and the search for meaning.
Provide Guidance and Hope: The Bible offers a moral compass and a source of comfort in a complex world.
Whether we approach the Bible with faith or with critical curiosity, its historical, literary, and philosophical significance is undeniable to both the critic and the believer. The evidence is just astonishing. Its ability to inspire, challenge, and guide people continues to resonate across all cultures and generations.
If this post has blessed you, feel free to subscribe to our newsletter share this with someone who might find this interesting. May the Lord bless you and keep you.